So, our entry into the short story unit should naturally have begun with reading a short story. This week we read Raymond Carver's Cathedral and I found our discussions on it to be very interesting. The major topic that we brushed on was intimacy of all sorts present in the story. There's a whole lot of it going on, so it was somewhat of a difficult task to break it all down.
The class, I think, agreed that the most passionate form of intimacy lies between Robert, the blind man, and the narrator's wife. Between the narrator and his wife is a pretty big lack of intimacy: physical, emotional, religious, or Romantic, it's all lacking somewhat. A class example came on page 218, where the narrator's wife only mentions Robert's name and never the narrator's, though he anxiously awaits its mention. We all agreed that Carver had intentions for this, to demonstrate the void of intimacy between them. Lastly, I find it interesting that all the intimacy in the story is centered around the narrator's wife. Her ex-husband, Robert, and her current husband, all shared some form of intimacy with her.
Intimacy is present in pretty much every story every made; I can't name a single one without it. It is the thread that binds characters and people together, and without it there's really nothing for an author to work with. It's very important, especially in a short story, to establish ties between the characters whether they be physical, emotional, or social. As we write our own short stories, I think it's very important to take this all into consideration.
Without any intimacy, the entire world would just be meaningless and void of emotion. Carver's story does a great job establishing it, even with a somewhat drone and simple narrator. This goes to show that intimacy exists aside of the speaker, that like postmodern memory, it exists around us and we are part of it. Intimacy is not a choice, but rather is omnipresent and we must acknowledge this in our writing.
Although a lot of people have touched on this intimacy topic in their blogs, I found the way you described it to be really accurate and capture the 'void' that Carver paints into the story. You made a really good point when you said that the wife was almost like an axis that her husband and ex-employer revolve around. She makes intimacy apparent both in its presence (with Robert) and in its absence (with her husband). The void of intimacy really made the story, and you did a great job of explaining why.
ReplyDeleteHey Pat!
ReplyDeleteExcellent Post! I totally agree. Intimacy, or any other form of love, is what binds characters together. Without that, stories are dull. All stories are the same, because they tell "our" story, about human life. Things that have human aspects, make things more relatable to us. Just like Tellytubbies are for toddlers. I think it conveys a huge message when Carver didn't put that into his story, giving a reader a sense of how dull his life is. :)